Subject: [Ffc] verify_tensors vs simple_verify_tensors

From: Anders Logg <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:39:11 +0100

Do we need both verify_tensor and simple_verify_tensors?

--
Anders

---

From: Kristian Oelgaard <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:54:54 +0100 (CET)

> Do we need both verify_tensor and simple_verify_tensors?

No, the only difference is that verify_tensor is general (although I'm sure it is seriously outdated) and simple_ is not.
I vote for deleting verify_tensor, if we for some reason need it later we can always revert and get whatever code we want.

Kristian

> --
> Anders
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAktUco8ACgkQTuwUCDsYZdF3JwCdGyiFCcgeM8mRPvrA1mfRfQB6
> u24AnjfsZFtaaLg0z7/Qeg+DtUKeS/+G
> =oVmY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc
> Post to     : [email-masked]
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>

---

From: Anders Logg <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:56:21 +0100

> I vote for deleting verify_tensor, if we for some reason need it later we can always revert and get whatever code we want.

ok, I'll remove verify_tensor and rename simple_verify_tensor -->
verify_tensor, and then try to make it run. I haven't tried it for
a while.

--
Anders